Asics
GT-2000 13 TR W - 1012B749-700
Choose US Sizes
Footwear Size (Women) - ASICS
| UK | EU | US | JP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 35.5 | 5 | 21.5 |
| 3.5 | 36 | 5.5 | 22 |
| 4 | 37 | 6 | 22.5 |
| 4.5 | 37.5 | 6.5 | 23 |
| 5 | 38 | 7 | 23.5 |
| 5.5 | 39 | 7.5 | 24 |
| 6 | 39.5 | 8 | 24.5 |
| 6.5 | 40 | 8.5 | 25 |
| 7 | 40.5 | 9 | 25.5 |
| 7.5 | 41.5 | 9.5 | 26 |
| 8 | 42 | 10 | 26.5 |
| 8.5 | 42.5 | 10.5 | 27 |
| 9 | 43.5 | 11 | 27.5 |
Adaptive on-demand stability for a smooth and balanced stride.
Move from apprehensive to assertive with the GT-2000™ 13 TR shoe’s 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ technology.
Designed to help provide adaptative on-demand stability, this shoe's support properties allow you to experience a smooth and balanced transition from footstrike to toe-off.
The midsole implements a full-length FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning unit and PureGEL™ technology. These features help provide a more energized toe-off with cloud-like softness underfoot.
Lastly, the hybrid outsole design is made for when your run transitions from the road to easy trails.
The ASICS GT 2000 13 is a daily trainer designed to provide stability and versatile cushioning for daily runs, walks, and workouts.
BEST FOR: All-Around | Stability | Support
Engineered jacquard mesh upper
Offers a supportive and comfortable foothold
Rearfoot PureGEL™ technology
3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ helps provide advanced stability for a smoother stride
FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning
Helps provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings
At least 50% of the shoe's main upper material is made with recycled content to reduce waste and carbon emissions
OrthoLite™ X-30 sockliner
This material helps provide lightweight impact absorption and a responsive rebound
Reflective details
Designed to improve visibility in low-light settings
AHARPLUS™ heel plug rubber
Helps provides soft step-in comfort
AHAR® LO outsole material
Helps improve durability
Trail-specific outsole design
Functional for road and groomed trail surfaces
The sockliner is produced with the solution dyeing process that reduces water usage by approximately 33% and carbon emissions by approximately 45% compared to the conventional dyeing technology
